Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James David Honsaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James David Honsaker

James David Honsaker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod; {{prod}} (and {{stub}}) tag removed by anonymous IP with no explanation. Not quite speediable due to the "award winning", but no indication of what these awards are, nothing to indicate what sort of composing he does and no information at all about the man himself. Needless to say, 0 Ghits on James David Honsaker and 1 ghit on Jim Honsaker, that 1 ghit being his Friendster page - which I'm not totally convinced is a reliable source — iridescenti (talk to me!) 13:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: He's 21, the only source is an inaccessible page on the Sibelius website. Mangoe 13:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, no sources cited which can count as reliable. I got to the webpage cited, and it further weakens the claim of notability by saying the awards were "regional". Hut 8.5 14:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete a modern composer known for lighting effects. That's all well and good, but where are the sources that verify this? Until they are produced, notability cannot be asserted. --Cyrus Andiron 15:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.