Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jae J. Jang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 10:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jae J. Jang

Jae J. Jang (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete.Not only is it mostly in Korean, but judging by the text that appears in English, it appears this person is not notable. Endless Dan 19:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - does not appear to be notable, possible vanity page. Also mostly in Korean. Weak Keep per cab. OSborn^arf 21:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (updated: OSborn^arf 02:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC))
• Strong Delete not only it is mess, the individual fails WP:BIO.--JForget 23:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletions. —PC78 23:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. The existing text is not worth translating as it consists entirely of unsourced hagiography that smells of copyvio from some pamphlet or brochure. However, the guy has had several newspaper articles written about him since he's the former president of the Korean Association of the Philippines, produced some movies a few years back, started up a charitable foundation, etc. [1][2][3]. cab 01:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Possibly notable per sources supplied by cab, but I don't think there's anything salvageable in the current article. Might be best to start over if an article is desired. PC78 01:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I restubbed/rewrote the article just now based on those sources. cab 01:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: as per Endless Dan's analysis. Watchingthevitalsigns 02:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Change to keep following rewrite by cab. PC78 02:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Carlossuarez46 22:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Nothing asserting notability in the article, the organisations he is stated to be involved with do not appear notable enough to have articles, nor does the film director he is associated with or the films he has produced. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 15:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.