Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacq LaMarche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that he fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jacq LaMarche

Jacq LaMarche (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable writer who fails WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable writer, no source, total crap. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't seem notable enough as WP:BIO, mainly edited by one contributor (Mdb1370), no recent edits, no external links or references. alex.muller (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: We're not judging the work of the author, just whether he's notable enough for a Wikipedia article. alex.muller (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: indeed, an author can have great work, but it's not Wikipedia's job to report on them until they are notable elsewhere. Wikipedia reports the news, doesn't make it. The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:BIO, upon search. Might want to nominate From Petoskey to Prague as well. The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Question Comment: Should the input of User:Mdb1370 be restored - in full or in part or in summary or not at all? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 07:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.