Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. E. Quidam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 01:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] J. E. Quidam

J. E. Quidam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable self-promotion page. His claim to notability turns out to be an e-book. I had previously nominated this for speedy deletion but it failed. Teleomatic (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Seemingly non notable person. Article has been tagged for refs and cleanup since August 2007, and nothing has been done to improve it. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 06:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:N. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No indication that he meets WP:BIO, article seems to be more of a WP:COATRACK for his ideas. Burzmali (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete seems nn -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.