Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itajuba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and redirect. Sidious1701 can substantially rewrite/improve his translation and merge it with the right article without this copyvio. Johnleemk | Talk 09:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Itajuba

From WP:PNT, been there since December 16. Discussion from WP:PNT follows... Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 20:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Portuguese. The article is about a town in Brazil. We already have an article about Itajubá. The two may be merged after translation. Zfr 18:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

* Partial copyvio? First section comes from here. Can't find the rest. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

*I am working on translating it. If anyone wishes me to stop, please tell me.Sidious1701 18:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

*I am finished translating, but since it is copyrighted, I don't know what to do.Sidious1701 20:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Nominator abstains. User:Sidious1701 claims to have translated the article, if so this translation should be added into the article, and mentioned below.... Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 20:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Itajubá mentioned in the discussion above. The translated parts from User:Sidious1701 can be merged with that one. - Bobet 21:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment, since it isn't apparent from my comment: delete first, then redirect because of the copyright issue. - Bobet 22:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, at least partial copyvio. Kappa 21:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• If it is a copyvio, then send it to the copyvio team. However, a translation of it would not be a copyvio. My vote is to Merge and redirect per Bobet. Stifle 13:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Sorry, I didn't know that if it was translated into English it wouldn't be copyrighted. So what you'll want me to do is to put my translation on this page?Sidious1701 22:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, translation alone doesn't change the copyright status of a text. Longer reply is on your talk page. - Bobet 00:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Okay. I guess I was right in the first place. So you want me to put my translation on this page? and you'll can fix it up?Sidious1701 12:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.