Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ironbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ironbox

Ironbox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete, Non-Encyclopedic and Non-Notable Jaymac407 18:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless independent sources are cited to establish notability per WP:N. EALacey 20:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete notabililty not even claimed, let alone established. Let's see some independent reviews & references. - Tiswas^(t/c) 13:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep since when did notability become synonymous with popularity? Read the talk threads on notability -- there is no consensus. If something exists, and it's real, and can be shown to be real, who cares how popular or known it is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.110.205.5 (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC).

• Comment - it goes without saying that notability and popularity are distinct and separate. However, this AfD addresses the notability of the subject, which is neither claimed, nor established. The whole point of notablity is that mere existence is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. Its popularity is moot. - Tiswas^(t/c)
• Comment - we also cannot take this comment, from someone who has caused so much vandalism on Wikipedia seriously. See the users talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaymac407 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.