Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invaderman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 08:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Invaderman
Zero claim of notability, nor sources that are not the author's own words. Google almost exclusively returns forum member pages. Prod removed without comment. Nifboy 19:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- delete per WP:NOIMAGINARYENTITIES. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yuser31415 03:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete with extreme prejudice: Copyright grant is questionable with regards to GFDL compatability; no claim of notability; not verifiable; and most important, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, which this is a grade A example of. Alba 05:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Alba. Eeblefish 05:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete hoax and/or copyvio. Storm05 15:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, utter nonsense with no sources. The copyright bit in the bottom is definitely the last straw on my camel. Natalie 21:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete with enough prejudice to run afoul of federal civil rights law. Imaginary, not notable, not verifiable, and a rather amusing copyvio to top it off. ShaleZero 02:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
