Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Induced dyslexia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Induced dyslexia

Induced dyslexia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

First-person essay, mainly original research and unsourced assertions Clicketyclack 09:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable original research, can't even find fringe sites about this, likely WP:HOAX. --Dhartung | Talk 13:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no citations, no supporting evidence, appears to be original research. -Jmh123 16:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Dletee. Tihs si orgiinal rseearhc fro srue, adn teh fcat taht ti's ni frist preson olny mkaes ti owrse. (Oh, come on, you knew someone was going to write their vote that way...) Seriously though, this page definitely makes no citations and appears to be original research to my eyes, too. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Actions • Words)))} 17:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. This is original research and is completely unfit for wikipedia.--Cailil ^talk 19:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as unsourced original research.DarkAudit 19:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete definitely original research, as seen by that form at the bottom.--Kylohk 21:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - an unsourced essay of original research Think outside the box 11:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - this is an obvious one. Completely unsourced, unwikified, and very likely untrue. Saluton 03:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.