Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the VIP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Proto||type 14:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In the VIP

Pay-for-porn web site. Aren't there like a gazillion trillion of these? Article doesn't explain why this is special (thus failing WP:WEB's The article itself must provide proof that its subject meets one of these criteria.) On the other hand has a surprisingly high Alexa rank of 3,910. Is this a particularly well known seller of porn? Deprodded. Weregerbil 09:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete. Very popular porn site, I've seen it myself many times, but in no way notable. JIP | Talk 09:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. PJM 11:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 13:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and JIP. --Andeh 13:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pornlinkspamvsca. Fan1967 14:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Maybe stub it and start a pron category? its actually a very notable site, blushes, and is part of a network of sites that include 8thStreetLatinas, MILFHunter, etc. Would this better be merged into an article about the parent network? Oddly the alexa rating of the parent network probably wouldnt be that high to meet WP:CORP, but the combined Alexa ratings of all subsites would probably far exceed that. The parent company is listed as NastyDollars but i believe that is just the host and the real parent company is RK Netmedia. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 15:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment No offense, but that has to be the one of the worst suggestions I've ever heard. Do you have any idea how many thousands of porn sites there are that would rush here to add their linkspam if we laid out the welcome mat for them? Fan1967

• I agree completely. Concepts of different kinds of porn sites are worthy of inclusion, but individual porn sites should be kept out of Wikipedia at any cost. The only way for an individual porn site to be notable is to be involved in a major scandal - the kind of thing that is mentioned in pretty much every newspaper for that day. Otherwise we'll have our hands full AfD'ing thousands of non-notable porn sites. JIP | Talk 16:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Merge I think someone should create an article for Nastydollars, which is the creator of this and other sites like MILF Hunter and Cumfiesta which should also be merged and deleted. At least, that's what some guy told me who knows more about porn sites than I do. Aguerriero (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JIP. Eluchil404 02:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.