Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigrant assimilation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cultural assimilation. As there's a lot of material to go over here, I'm simply going to do my best to ferret out the obvious OR and improperly-sourced material before adding the content to the cultural assimilation article. If anyone would like to volunteer to do additional cleanup once this is done, it'd be much appreciated. --jonny-mt 04:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Immigrant assimilation

Immigrant assimilation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to be an OR Essay LegoTech·(t)·(c) 03:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

• Merge the sourced parts into Cultural assimilation. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge sourced parts as above, delete the rest which is original research. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, but cleanup by removing excess verbiage (e.g., "When assessing immigrant assimilation researchers need to be aware that...," "When considering immigrant assimilation it is important to consider...," "It is believed that...," etc.) and (if necessary) neutralizing point of view. Cf. Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words and Wikipedia:words to avoid. If the decision is to merge and/or redirect, then please take care to preserve history, in compliance with GFDL. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge The cultual assimilation articlewas better. I'm an Editorofthewiki^{[citation needed]} 21:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.