Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Il Globo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Robert 18:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Il Globo

Fails WP:CORP, prod removed Tychocat 19:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Old ethnic newspaper. Part of our Australian coverage. I don't see how Wp:Corp applies, nor do I think the comment about the prod is in any way relevant. --JJay 20:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it's good to know that somebody tried prod before coming here. That it was removed without the recommended comment, discussion, or improvement is also useful information to me in evaluating the situation. --William Pietri 21:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    • I guess you would be wrong then. [1] --JJay 22:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
      • You're correct. Sorry, I must have looked at the wrong diff. Next time I'd suggest a more explicit edit comment, though. --William Pietri 14:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
    • OK, no problem. Thanks for changing your vote. --JJay 18:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless evidence of notability appears. --William Pietri 21:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Changing to Keep per Capitalist Roadster. --William Pietri 14:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep a sourced statement of circulation over 20,000 passes my bar of notability, articles like these are important to combat systemic bias in our coverage. --Eivind^t@c 22:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I think a non-english paper in a primarily english speaking country that has been going for over 45 years and has a circulation that large is most definately notable, and deserves expansion. Viridae^Talk 23:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable ethnic newspaper in Australia. Nino Randazzo, its cofounder and editor for almost all of the 45 year, is now a member of the Italian Senate having been elected to one of the seats set aside for expatriate Italians. My understanding is that it has a fairly large circulation, especially for an ethnic newspaper. Capitalistroadster 03:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. JPD (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. Somebody might consider creating a page for La Fiamma as well. SM247^{My Talk} 02:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per others. An56 04:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Inner Earth 09:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalroadster. --Canley 04:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 18:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- Longhair 18:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, has large circulation —Pengo 06:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep nobable part of Australian history and multi culturalism. Besides the editor has recently been elected to the Italian senate. --Michael Johnson 11:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.