Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Hornak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sango123 17:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ian Hornak

non notable, unverified claims, no sources or references. by the exaggerated language, appears to be vanity, or advertisement. Contributor has also created multiple entries of the another subject (variations of name Eric Spoutz) which looks further like spam. Tychocat 02:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep for now at least. From here it seems that the subject is a moderately notable artist. The article is in bad shape, however, I'll grant you. --Deville (Talk) 02:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Does well on the google test[1], deletion is not a substitution for cleanup, which is what this article needs. Yanksox (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but totally rewrite/cleanupBwithh 04:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - since it passes google test, though it does requires cleanup. No sources/references/unveriified does ends up with deletion for now. --WinHunter (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and rewrite per above. --Coredesat 06:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Cleanup and rewrite The artist is represented in many large collections; this biography doesn't do them justice.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Needs cleanup. As a starter: remove the italics from the names of the museums. Interlingua talk 15:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but needs work. Most of those collections are buy-by-the-yard corporate collections used to decorate offices, and have no evident artistic authority. Some citations from art critics would not go amiss. Just zis Guy you know? 12:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.