Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IWin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

One-line ad for IWin.com. Need I say more? -- Mud 15:52, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete: not notable. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:27, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Ick! Er, I mean delete. "An exclamation point should only be used in direct discourse, and then when one of the parties is on fire." :-) Geogre 16:13, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Was promotional. I've now replaced the text with the single sentence, "iwin.com is an online gambling site." I believe this to be accurate and NPOV—but a nonencyclopedic substub. Might reconsider my vote in the unlikely event that someone adds neutral, interesting, encyclopedic information to the article. Dpbsmith 16:28, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • We already have an article at IWin.com. Redirect and delete. The article IWin.com isn't a whole lot better than this one, but it's a stub. blankfaze | •­• 20:25, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Redirect and delete. - Lucky 6.9 23:08, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • How can you redirect and delete? Keep as redirect. anthony (see warning)
  • Well, which do you want to do? Redirect or delete? I don't see how you can do both - either IWin is redirected to IWin.com, or both of them are deleted, since they are clearly the same topic. I'll lean towards redirect/keep - IWin.com could do with some work, but I guess the subject's basically sound. - IMSoP 01:12, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) (via edit conflict)
  • Changing this into a redirect would sufficiently delete the current content, but I meant to imply that deleting it would also delete the original history leaving us with a fresh new redirect. Sorry 'bout the mix-up. - Lucky 6.9 00:10, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Then create redirect (since the IWin.com article is a stub with some info on what the site is and some corporate info). Chris N. 20:36, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • I got bold and redirected it. Keep as redirect. I see no point in bothering to delete the history. --ssd 05:54, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)