Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IPod software

IPod_software (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Someone previously proposed PROD because "this is more of a description of a category than an article, not notable and zero references. Speedy delete?". The page is in pretty lousy shape, but this looks like an area that could actually use an article - iPod software (Apple and 3rd-party) has a significant impact on a number of people's lives. The techniques behind it are well discussed though Apple doesn't participate in those discussions. I'd say keep in accordance with WP:HEYdelete, but I thought I'd put that up for discussion. Coanda-1910 (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't seem like anybody is inclined (or able) to improve the article, and it isn't in good enough shape to keep as is.Coanda-1910 (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as there is no content except a spam-link. WillOakland (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete' per PROD rationale (I originally posted the PROD). ~ Paul^T+/_C 22:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. eDenE 20:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete insufficient to justify a separate article. --BrucePodger (talk) 23:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.