Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh mcmanners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Eluchil404 00:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hugh mcmanners

User:Downwards tagged this article as speedy delete with a rationale of "vanity article", but I did not feel it passed CSD A7 since notability was asserted. So, here it is for procedural reasons and I abstain. hateless 08:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, but move to Hugh McManners. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 08:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. A search at google for "Sunday Times" "Hugh McManners", and Amazon for "Hugh McManners" shows that he was the ST defence correspondent and has written several books. How much of the rest is true, I have no idea. The article needs references, and I will tag it. Mr Stephen 08:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Mr Stephen. Not a speedy keep candidate. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - notable journalist at minimum (have moved as suggested) Saga City 12:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - certainly a notable journalist. --JennyRad 19:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mr Stephen Maxamegalon2000 23:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.