Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houses of Morrowind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 18:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Houses of Morrowind

Houses of Morrowind (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Elder Scrolls games. As Wikipedia is not a gameguide, and this is all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:FICTION. RMHED (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It does appear to be material available elsewhere. --Stormbay 18:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• delete - who keeps creating these elder scrolls articles? not notable, outside of elder scrolls. keep the elder scrolls information in actual elder scrolls articles. Cackalackakilla (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:FICTION. Maser ^(Talk!) 02:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep or Merge This holds information that should not be destroyed. If anything at all should be done with it, it should be merged with Organizations of Elder Scrolls. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Grey Wizard (talk • contribs) 17:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Spare us the dramatics Grey Wizard, if there is nothing notable about the article, nothing valuable is being destroyed. And if you care about it so much, please find it some references so it actually wont be deleted, as a vote to keep without referencing or a compelling argument will do little. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Keep or Merge Realy usefull information. At least merge this with Organizations of Elder Scrolls. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.247.57.218 (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

"Useful is not a criteria to keep an article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Keep or Merge this info is very important and should be saved at most move somewhere else —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.220.237.201 (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Then transwiki it or get someone else to do it before its gone. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm no wiki-rock star Judgesurreal, I am your average user that enjoys researching things and continuing to learn, not just about elder scrolls, but science, math, music, culture, etc... I use this project all the time for my personal enjoyment. I would gladly cite sources in this article if you would be willing to help me out learning how to code the pages. I have made a few pages in the past, but only left external links. Help would be appreciated for making the Internet as a whole more comprehensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Grey Wizard (talk • contribs) 18:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

That's fine, not everyone is, but I contend that this page has no notability, and if you disagree you have to find some references, that's just the way it is. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely, I just don't want to see comprehensive data go down the hole. If I insulted you, no hard feelings, Elder Scrolls does have a soft spot in my heart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Grey Wizard (talk • contribs) 18:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.