Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot demolition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 18:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hot demolition

Hot demolition (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable. Source describes only one instance of use, without a description of how widely spread the practice is, and source does not seem to be much corroborated. Adds little or nothing to wikipedia. Deltopia 14:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Appears to be a dictionary term.--Edtropolis 14:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this is a hoax. Capmango 15:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I thought it was a hoax, too, but didn't want to base the nomination solely on that. Outside of the cited harper's article and wikimirrors, I've found no evidence that any such thing exists. But even if it does, needs deletion. Deltopia 16:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Dont think it qualifies as a hoax. However, I believe it does fall to be deleted as a neologism. Ohconfucius 03:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's a hoax. I guarantee you that if you douse a rat with kerosene and set him on fire, he will NOT go running from shack to shack setting them on fire for you. He will take two steps and fall over. Not that I have tried this, mind you. Capmango 16:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.