Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong City Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 04:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hong Kong City Mall

Hong Kong City Mall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not only is this page highly POV, it's also a mall that fails WP:RS, as a search for sources found none. Claims to be a popular tourist destination, but an online search proved otherwise. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, agree with the nom. Unsourced OR. Cirt (talk) 04:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC).
• Keep - multiple RS provided (well 2 atleast, I admit 1 is iffy), it is a popular destination. POV I'll let you edit as its not grounds for deletion. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 05:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER 94 13:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nominator. Malinaccier (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per discussions above. If deleted, the included template probably needs to be update to not link the malls that will not likely get articles. If the template is not updated, then we will be here again and again. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.