Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Online (column)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 17:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hollywood Online (column)

Hollywood Online (column) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails to assert notability (a magazine column running 2003-2006... about movie websites?); Google for "'hollywood online' adam pearce" gives only 8 hits. The parent magazine, DVD Monthly, may be notable, but it doesn't even have an article. In addition, conflict of interest is also a concern as the creating user, Adamjpearce (talk · contribs), identifies as the author of the column. I recommend userfy, which should be harmless. Unint 00:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I dont see any notability / media coverage just for this column Corpx 02:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no notability for this column. Oysterguitarist 04:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. If DVD Monthly magazine doesn't seem to have an article then how can a column within it be notable? Perhaps the magazine is notable and should have an article; I don't know.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 10:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.