Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoang Long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 08:55Z

[edit] Hoang Long

Hoang Long (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Unverified location, just a small village mentioned in the article in the 'External Link' part Saigon punkid 06:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Physical locations are notable no matter the size. --Charlene 06:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. External link is actually a reference which proves the village exists, so it fulfills WP:V just fine. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Geographical location, ergo notable. -- Necrothesp 12:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Noöne proposed deleting Kurów; and this village is no worse Al-Bargit 17:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Its a village, people! —Gaff ^ταλκ 20:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Even miniscule geographic locations can be noteworthy! —xanderer 21:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. All cities, towns, and villages are notable regardless of their size or location. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 21:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep --MarlaB 08:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Denny 05:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Real village. --Oakshade 04:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.