Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillsong Wildlife
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hillsong Wildlife
The author removed the speedy tags twice without explanation, and then did the same with prod tags, and then added a lot of awful images, so I'm listing it here. Basically, this is a non-notable association, and the article is pure vanity. Oh, if it is deleted, whoever makes the deletion please kill those images too. Sarg 19:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, lack of notability and vanity. --Porqin 20:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, or merge into Hillsong Church. Without the pictures, of course. Somebody really loves the Hillside gang, even has it's own category. --Richhoncho 20:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete because there's really nothing here but pictures. No sources are cited and I don't see why this is notable. I agree with the nominator: it's vanity. Allisonmontgomery69 22:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- NO! Delete how is it not notable? this is part of hillsong church, the pictures show how it is on a friday night. wikipedia is the largest free encyclopedia online, so i still dont know why people have problems, this article is also neutral towards wildlife. there is no reason to remove this. more info is yet to come within the next 7 days —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.96.253 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
