Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilarious consequences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:45, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hilarious consequences

Subject is not encyclopedic and undeserving an article. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 05:46, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 07:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. WP is not a dictionary or usage guide. Flapdragon 14:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• There was also a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/hilarious consequences listed in the AFD log. I had voted delete there and I vote delete now. Oh, and I redirected it to this AFD page once I realized it existed. --Optichan 19:31, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, without hilarious consequences. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.