Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herzogstand Aerial Tramway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Sources now provided. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Herzogstand Aerial Tramway

Herzogstand Aerial Tramway (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced since June 2006, this article gives no assertion of notability. A Google search turns up nothing, not even a confirmation of its existence. —BradV 02:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. This unrefenced article was on here for nearly two years? Let's get rid of it now! Qworty (talk) 02:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • comment why not make a request for sources at the reference desk?NewAtThis (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't think that's what the reference desk is for. Currently there are 119,691 unreferenced articles on Wikipedia. I don't think the reference desk is equipped to start handling requests for references. —BradV 03:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. deWP gives the following sources [1] and [2] For those not understanding German, there are photos, and the statistics. I cannot account for why the person translating the deWP article did not include them. DGG (talk) 06:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Under its German name, Herzogstandbahn, there are many sources about this tramway [3] [4] [5][6].--Oakshade (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - I've added the Weblinks from deWP. It's definitelly not a Hoax. --PaterMcFly (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - nominator is a confirmed sockpuppet who nominated many articles for deletion as a means of disruption. See user's talk page and follow from there. withdraw comment made in mistake - sorry; Wikidemo (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
No, nominator was BradV, not NewAtThis. Jfire (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.