Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry potter relationships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Avada Kedavra — Caknuck 02:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

That's Delete to you Mugglepedians. Caknuck 02:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harry potter relationships

Harry potter relationships (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Beginnings of an unmaintainable list ... let's kill this before it gets out of control. Blueboy96 14:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Laughably bad. Original research of course. - Cyborg Ninja 14:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Believe me, I wanted to slap a speedy tag on it ... but I couldn't find a valid CSD to use. Only reason I didn't prod it was because I figured that if I brought it here, we'd see snow in July. Blueboy96 14:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Only took 6 minutes to get nominated for AfD, too! - Cyborg Ninja 14:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

:::I've tagged it for speedy because the list is incomplete and there is virtually little context.--JForget 00:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I would've tagged this with Nonsense... --L^ie!

• Delete. Pointless list, going nowhere. WWGB 14:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - pointless. Even when merged into the correct page, it won't even be that "major". Onnaghar (Talk) 15:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Wow, it's a Harry Potter sexchart! --Dhartung | Talk 15:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Crumbs! Delete per nom. --Malcolmxl5 15:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of sources on why Harry Potter's relationships are notable Corpx 16:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverified, unverifiable, and utterly non-notable.--Frenchman113 on wheels! 16:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per everything above. The author didn't even bother capitalizing the proper name Potter. /Blaxthos 17:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Gentle delete It looks like the work of a youngster. --ROGER ^TALK 20:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete via Wp:bite per nom, and Roger. Pharmboy 22:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete I'm pretty much sure it is mentionned in many of the character's articles which means this article has no value whatsoever.JForget 23:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong, Expedited, Warp Speed Delete. Utterly ridiculous, I feel moderately unclean and at a loss of IQ from reading it.Ravenmasterq 00:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Ravenmasterq
• Speedy get out a fiddle while it burns OR, Listcruft, should go in their biographies, NPOV, probably not notable. There are so many things wrong with this page, I almost want to BJAODN it, but it's not funny. --L^ie! 02:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Completely useless and ridiculous. Not worth the enormous amount of effort that would be required to clean it up. →evin290 18:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete doesn't include Harry/Basilisk Will ^(talk) 14:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete "Hermione likes Gildory Lockhart"? Go to a tree and carve H.G. + G.L. if that needs to be said. Wikipedia is not a water tower. Mandsford 14:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.