Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriet Stokes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. CitiCat ♫ 03:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Harriet Stokes
Non-notable except for being sorta-transgender, which doesn't qualify for WP:N or WP:BIO. No sourced found. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge with Eonism -- although that term is not commonly used, I understand. I think that article is where historical cases of living as the opposite sex should end up, unless someone has a better suggestion. Transvestism? I agree that no sources can be found, so this particular case may be better off deleted. Accounting4Taste 01:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment There is room for an article on the phenomenon of people secretly living cross-gendered - particularly historical expamples - but Harriet probably doesn't need her own page. Merge into Eonism for now, and look for a better name. MarkBul 02:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Harriet's not a good example, you're right. I think Jeanne Baré is a better one. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia isn't News of the Weird for the 19th century, either. Not a notable case. --Dhartung | Talk 03:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and do not redirect per Dhartung. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete – NN. Humorous anecdote, about the hat and all. Tiptopper 16:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
