Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HanuRamaKwanzMas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 07:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HanuRamaKwanzMas

Borderline violation of WP:NOR and non-notable. Google brings up a very small 110 results. — CRAZY`(IN)`SANE 09:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's a garbage neologism, and one that nobody cares about. -- Kicking222 14:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn neologism NawlinWiki 14:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above Tom Harrison ^Talk 15:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Chrismahanukwanzakah should also be deleted - a similar garbage neologism created for a short-lived advertising campaign, which makes it even more deletable than the current nomination, since its borderline marketing abuse of wikipedia. If Newtonmas can be thrown on the wikibonfire of the neologisms, so can both of these silly terms Bwithh 21:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Also add Jewmas to the list of deletion-worthy Christmas-type neologistic festivals. This term only gets 920 Google hits, compared to 158,000 for Chrismukkah Bwithh 21:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism. Invitatious 00:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 00:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. —Khoikhoi 04:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.