Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Hodell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Basically a client listing. Sr13 05:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hamilton Hodell

Non notable modelling agency; non-notable clients. --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral Article, as it is, is a wreck, just a list of names. That said, I hardly think Emma Thompson or Stephen Fry count as non-notable. Their website suggests this agency discovered both.--Ispy1981 20:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete without prejudice to recreation with sources. Google News Archive shows some results in passing demonstrating A-list clientele, but there isn't much about the agency per se. --Dhartung | Talk 23:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete a laundry list disguised as an article. In desperate need a complete re-write. delete in the meantime. Ohconfucius 09:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - regardless of notability or reliable sources, the current article isn't the base from which an article can be built. -- Whpq 14:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.