Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gujjuweb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was - Delete Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 21:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gujjuweb

Gujjuweb (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

A highly-used ten year old website would have some coverage if it were notable, it doesn't. Ghits are forum posts and mentions of the software used to run it. Article claims its a source for a large Gujarati population, not that this population uses it. Per their own site, 'recent' comments were a minimum of three weeks old. No evidence this passes WP:WEB Travellingcari (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  04:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

• Merge/Redirect to Gujarati people. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Gary King (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, their own description as having only a few hundred subscribers, and an apparent lack of reliable sources (GNews just gets a press release and a passing mention): Find sources: Gujjuweb — news, books, scholar. Do not merge to Gujarati people, which would be an utterly inappropriate redirect and add no useful information to that article. By that same logic, should we merge non-notable European MySpace clones to white people? cab (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —86.149.53.196 (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.