Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grounding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 02:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grounding

I'm somewhat ambivalent about this page; it seems to be a collection of dictionary defs that belong in Wikitionary. However, there is some minimal content that seems to go beyond being simple dictionary definitions. In any case, at least some of the defs should be transwiki'd -- Bletch 20:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep, and fix up per nom. Tom Harrison (talk) 21:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Transwiki a list of dicdefs does not an article make. --Pboyd04 22:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Move Dictionary definitions belong on Wiktionary. -- (aeropagitica) UK 23:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Grounding is a legitimate action when building an electrical circuit. --Ancheta Wis 17:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - IMO, the only part of the article that seems to be anything more than a dictionary definition is the part that pertains to disciplining children, but even that part is pretty anemic. The others should definitely be sent off to Wikitionary. --Bletch 22:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • keep But should have the links put in, even if they are redirects to the most appropriate page. It needs a disambiguation page, and in the current absence of pages on what it links to, it does the job. But it ashgould certainly have page amde, even if they do not exopand much on what it says on the disambig. Dolive21 17:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.