Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenvangelical

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 06:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Greenvangelical

Non-notable, very few (2 from and they're from the Daily Show) google hits, recently constructed religion Broken S 02:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not encyclopedic, not notable, crystal ball, and, since they want 1/4 of your money, advertising. TheMadBaron 03:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. I got one unique google hit. It's just a lame (personally irritating and mildly offencive) joke which no-one has ever heard of. --Qirex 06:10, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete as per Qirex. --Apyule 10:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Don't DeleteGranted, I put it in there, but of course it doesn't have many entries in google - it is only 24 hours old!. The Tithe is .25%, not 25%. At least 850 of us have heard of it, we were at poptech. We learned of the "Daily Show" guy after we googled it. --User:mdaitzman 10:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
    • this vote is actually by User:24.91.217.87 Broken S 15:59, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as part of "War on Portmanteaux" --MacRusgail 16:44, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't delete link entry under New_religious_movements and Environmental_movement. The Daily_Show reference was not a joke but interview with Pastor Richard Cizik of the National_Association_of_Evangelicals who argues for the Right_Wing to embrace Environmentalism. The Tithe is of a non-commercial nature. Religions often fuse concepts like Uni[fied/Sec]tarian, or Scient[ific/Ont]ology, so Green[MovementE]vangelical has precedents. --ProfessorAI
    • User's second edit. Broken S 01:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per TheMadBaron. -Nameneko 05:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.