Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Agbonlahor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 08:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Great Agbonlahor

Great Agbonlahor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No references or notability stated. Notable for one event, so he fails WP:BLP1E. The Michael McDowell article already covers similar events, so this should be deleted and the relevant contents merged there. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 14:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. A limited search finds no references. WP:BLP1E is a deal-breaker as well, and I can find no other circumstances for which the subject would actually be notable (though sources might prove me wrong). ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, or maybe put these few sentences into the article on McDowell. —ScouterSig 14:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Still delete. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 12:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable for own page, could be mentioned in a broader article as said above. -- Dougie WII 13:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete per WP:BLP1E and possibly WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. The news has died down here in Ireland about him, and he's now just another deportee - despite all the efforts to break the rules for him. Stifle (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.