Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldeneye setup editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was let it snow, let it snow, let it snow. Sr13 05:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Goldeneye setup editor

Goldeneye setup editor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of sourcing, contested speedy. A Google search turns up possible sources, but not many 3rd party. David Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 01:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete blatant ad, near speedy. -- Ekjon Lok 01:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Mos def. It's promotional. -- Rob C (Alarob) 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is an ad, pure and simple. Notability is near non-existent. DarkAudit 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete, almost spam. Almost. Not notable. We're not sourceforge or freshmeat. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete this article is an advert. Not only that, but parts of it are written in a POV and first-person manner, such as the statement "This is one of my personal favorite features" that is written in the "Features of the Goldeneye Setup Editor" section. Acalamari 02:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11 --Whstchy 03:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't appear notable. Maxamegalon2000 05:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising plain and simple.--Drat (Talk) 05:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.