Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goalie when ned

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Rush goalie. - Mailer Diablo 02:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goalie when ned

Non notable - gets precisely zero google hits. Francs2000 22:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day -- Krash 00:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I would advise Francs2000 to visit the north, where the use of goalie when ned is widely used. The deletion of this article would only seek to increase the gap between north and south. Mark Boz 00:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Note: on close inspection it is highly likely that the above and below user are sockpuppets or meatpuppets of each other: compare user contributions.
  • I think perhaps, further research should be invested to determine whether or not this is a known school playground activity. By the description, it is feasible, even though I have never heard of it Boris Apple 00:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Krash. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 01:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Redirect per Uncle G below. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 22:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete in order to increase the gap between that depressing void known as 'the North' and the south as far as possible because while it may be feasible, it's not verfiable. Even if Francs2000 is good enough to take the train up to whichever school this came from, that's scarcely repeatable by anyone else looking for a source on this. --Malthusian (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • This may have been made up in school one day, but not only is it documented, we already have an article on it. There's nothing of value in this article worth merging, since the only content that isn't in our existing article is unverifiable. Redirect to rush goalie. Uncle G 10:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Uncle G, on the money as always. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redorect per Uncle G. --Terence Ong 13:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Uncle G. Qwghlm 17:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per UncleG Werdna648T/C\@ 22:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.