Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizmodo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Luke! 23:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC) [1], [2], Gizmodo called one of the flagship blogs of Gawker media (with substantial info on Gizmodo itself): [3]. Note that all the blog links I posted are non-self-published blogs with editorial oversight, which should qualify as a reliable source. hateless 20:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, I'm sorry, 1179 results in Google News, 1800 in Google News Ar.google.com/books?q=gizmodo 13 in Google Books. I strongly suggest the use of a search engine before making a nomination, no matter that the article is a stub. --Dhartung | Talk 21:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Withdraw Nomination For whatever reason my Google search did not yield these results, it now appears clear that this blog satisfies WP:WEB.--RWR8189 21:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Yeah, Gizmodo is pretty well known and recognizable adavidw 21:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.