Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giving the shaft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IanManka deleted "Giving the shaft" (CSD G1; giving this article the shaft). Navou ^banter 07:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Giving the shaft (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Complete bollocks, unencyclopedic, bad grammar Shady Tree Man 04:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Giving the shaft

• In agreement this is just a bunch of silliness - take it away - Markco1 04:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy DeleteNo argument here.Ganfon 04:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. So tagged. MER-C 04:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete no doubts. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 04:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice per nom. That thing's a trainwreck. ThuranX 04:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Copmplete bollucks. Whimsical attack page. The term "shafted" or "getting the shaft" long predated the movie "Shaft." Article lacks sourced factual content. Edison 04:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment It even predates the original Shaft, much less the Sam Jackson version. Fan-1967 05:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as obvious vandalism.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Shaft's a valid slang term, but it's already mentioned on Wiktionary. This article is a load of bollocks. Quack 688 05:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Bucketsofg 05:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.