The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
From speedy, but not a candidate. "Hoax". Delete.r3m0ttalk 23:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:V. I made Gill smith point to this article, so give that one the same fate as this. -- Perfecto 23:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. (Oh, all right.) Melchoir 23:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Should be deleted. Not true. Obviously a wind up. No such person exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.106.4 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 8 January 2006
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.