Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghazi Abdul Qayyum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 16:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ghazi Abdul Qayyum

This was prodded a while back and has been prodded again. It's tagged as original research. I'm just moving it here as a courtesy to the most recent prodder, I don't currently have an opinion. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep as I think this squeaks by under WP:BIO and has plenty of verifiable sources. My only objections are to the WP:NPOV. I'd like to see a big cleanup of this article. This is poorly written encycylopedia material, as is. If a major cleanup can be undertaken, then I say keep. Scorpiondollprincess 18:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Still: needs POV cleanup badly. GregorB 18:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless NPOV'd. If that's done I'll reconsider. Dlyons493 Talk 20:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Either Delete or, at a pinch, strip to a stub. The online sources that are linked seem to tend towards POV themselves. There's no reason there couldn't be a good article under this title, but what we have isn't a helpful starting point. Pseudomonas 21:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.