Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghanshyam thori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ghanshyam thori

Ghanshyam thori (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Just look at the article. Mr.K. (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete, no assertion of notability. That being said, it's generally considered a good idea for AfD nominators to give their reasons for doing so, and on anything other than a blatant Speedy I would have voted Keep pending those reasons. If you have the time to file an AfD, you have the time to type all of two extra sentences explaining why. RGTraynor 15:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Some how I do explained why. This article is terrible at the first sight. Just look at the article, I said. Mr.K. (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

That is no explanation that invokes any policies or guidelines under which this article is eligible to be deleted. "This article is terrible" isn't a factor. RGTraynor 22:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete; violates WP:BIO --Mhking 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, this is somebody's mini-CV, not an encyclopedia article. --Seattle Skier (talk) 07:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as it's not yet a suitable subject for wikipedia. Mr. Berry 23:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.