Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry Stephen Freedman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gerry Stephen Freedman

Vanity about failed local authority candidate, who holds public office only at the most local level (Community Councillor) Mtiedemann 11:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:BIO - local candidates are not notable and failed candidates are even less so. Reads as a vanity article - Peripitus (Talk) 13:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Peripitus. --David Mestel^(Talk) 15:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable politician; fails WP:BIO and reads like a vanity article as suggsted above by Peripitus hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 20:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for having held elected office (even if it was on the local level). Needs a metric ton of cleanup; hopefully some kind soul will do the dirty work. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 16:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Peripitus. Joe 03:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO - 6 ghits, WP top and none of them press, TV or radio. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.