Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Guidestones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn nom, default keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 03:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Georgia Guidestones

NN, article does try to establish notability and never establishes what subject of article actually is (date of origion, geogoly etc). Text is partisan, inconsistent and misleading, real agenda is not revealed. unscientific nonsense Coil00 04:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The monument is described by reliable sources, and the material is verifiable and NPOV. The fact that the meaning of the monument is mysterious does not make it non-notable. -Will Beback 04:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems notable. The other flaws listed could be fixed by editing, and I'm not seeing most of them anyway -- e.g., date of origin is there under "History." --Celithemis 04:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. This is a problem article, but it should be improved, not deleted. Erechtheus 04:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as a notable monument. AfD is not for articles that merely need cleanup. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Withdraw nom I don't think there is anything 'mysterious' about this monument, but I take the points being made: its a clean up/NPOV issue, not afd. Oops. Coil00 12:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.