Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garnier Fructis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 07:00, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Garnier Fructis

Advertising. RickK 06:43, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Nup. Don't delete. Definetely disagree. Garnier Fructis is a very big company which produces the best hair products. Any chic would agree with me, and probably guys too. I would call it a stub though... 04:23, Jun 11, 2005 (EST) (anon comment added by User:130.220.39.3)
• Cleanup - needs major revision and NPOVifying. It is a company, though, so that much is deserving of an article. --FCYTravis 06:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No more notable than any other shampoo. --Xcali 06:55, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep - I edited the page to remove the POV comments. Definately a stub now. Epolk 07:47, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, thanks Epolk. Kappa 08:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable haircare product. Capitalistroadster 08:55, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable brand. Shimmin 12:28, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. -- BD2412 ^talk 19:14, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Keep Their new-age TV jingle sometimes invades my dreams, so I may have been brainwashed to vote this way. :) Xoloz 03:58, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: is the proper name of the company "Garnier" or "Garnier Frustis"? --Xcali 05:50, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.