Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gabana

Gabana (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reason: article has been marked for cleanup since May with no changes. Even the initial article had severe POV problems and the current version is in my opinion much worse. will381796 15:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - I can find no salvagable, sourced, notable content. /Blaxthos 15:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I have removed the indents that rendered the text difficult to read due to the "non-format" boxes (I hate to scroll horizontally) just so I could at least evaluate the article in proper format. The article's first sentence claims that "Gabana" is an emotion, and yet the article is about some kind of musical group/artist. Granted, the article is very badly written, and disjointed, but I have a hard time finding anything that justifies keeping it and attempting to re-write it. While Google does come up with some hits for a band named Gabana, it would not appear that this band meets the notability requirements for musicians/ensembles, and seems to be evident when the article itself states: Official discography consists of 2 singles. Additionally, no references at all are given, and the external links are either associated with the band, or fan site of some kind. Ariel♥Gold 19:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BAND. --Bfigura (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Quite aside from having some serious POV and style issues, there is nothing in here to suggest notability. Tx17777 20:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as NN and can not be salvaged in any way. 00:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian (talk • contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.