Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foul Mouth Shirts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'DELETE - Nabla 18:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Foul Mouth Shirts

Foul Mouth Shirts (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article was originally a G7 speedy-deletion. DRV found an assertion of notability was present, and so refers the matter for a full AfD. This is a procedural listing, so I abstain. Xoloz 19:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Rewrite Rewrite as encyclopedia article. If not rewritten with reliable sourcing by AFD close, delete. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral I have never heard of these people and their claim to notability is backlinks. A good Search engine optimizer would manufacture such notability. However, the number of google hits lends credibility. The problem of this page is that the age of the company begs WP:VSCA contestation. I truly believe they are a valid subject for a counterculture article and but have trouble voting to keep the article as presented. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I see no google hits at all. I searched for "Foul Mouth Shirts" and only one link was actually related to the site. Hardly a basis for notability. G1ggy! 11:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless some of the claims of reliable source coverage in the article are turned into references. Google only returns ads and blogs. Nuttah68 13:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.