Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foster youth education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Foster youth education

Foster youth education (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Blatant original research paper. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 00:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• Snowball Delete. A- in no way is this going to ever be a good article, and B- Wikipedia is not a place to post your term paper.TheLetterM 01:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as obvious original research and unencyclopedic Life, Liberty, Property 01:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. --דניאל - Dantheman531 01:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete per TheLetterM. This isn't an article, it's a thesis.--Sethacus 01:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Plow it per nom. This article is buried in WP:SNOW. --Evb-wiki 02:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as an essay. (Please don't !vote snowball deletion when there's nothing showing a consensus yet, and please don't advocate speedy deletion for things that are not eligible.) --Dhartung | Talk 04:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unattributed and poorly written. Carlosguitar 04:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - OR and I think it may even be a copy vio by the looks of it. Spawn Man 06:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.