The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Is with the present content not notable Inge 15:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete Useful information in this article is minimal to non-existent. If the author must share this information with the world, merge it as a paragraph into the Lundy article as trivia, but it's definitely not worthy enough to have a whole article dedicaed to it. Tx17777 17:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete for lack of actual content LHOON 14:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.