Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Glasgow Route 62
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - NYC JD (make a motion) 21:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] First Glasgow Route 62
I believe this article should be deleted as it is non notable. Fraslet 15:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 03:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Article is notable. First routes operate all over Scotland, and the article seems to be made with First Glasgow to provide more info. Rysin3 15:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information this article is simply overkill and does not contain enough notable information to make it worthwhile on its own. Fraslet 15:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per all of above. Buscruft. Edeans 02:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Mais oui! 08:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I originally created these articles because they emcompass two key routes in the Greater Glasgow area; I believe that the "overkill" comment would be justified if every Route received an article, but in this case I beg to differ. Anthonycfc [T • C] 19:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into a List of routes article similar to List of bus routes in Manhattan. Applies to the two other First Glasgow AFD nominations listed. --Polaron | Talk 07:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
