Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firmdale Hotels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WinHunter ^(talk) 20:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Firmdale Hotels

Firmdale Hotels (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Article reads like a brochure, it's all but orphaned, and has no substance - Tiswas^(t/c) 13:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G11 - spam, no assertion of notability. YechielMan 19:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete per YechielMan. Looks like advertising to me. --Cyrus Andiron 12:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, probably could fall under G11. Why hasn't it been tagged? Rockstar (^T/_C) 17:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, clearest case of G11 (advert, no content). So tagged. -- Ekjon Lok 18:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.