Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireball (Charmed)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fireball (Charmed)

Fireball (Charmed) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 02:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable fancruft. Realkyhick 03:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Wow! Fireballs?! That's a new one... *Yawn* ;) NN, Crufty and no context in the real world. Spawn Man 04:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom and Realkyhick. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 06:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Aww, what was wrong with my argument? Waah! :..( Spawn Man 07:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - (per Spawn Man) for an excellent argument :) No independent notability or context for what's described by the article as a very generic theme in the series itself. ◄Zahakiel► 15:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • :) Spawn Man 04:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unnecessary detail of fiction that does not aid in the understanding of the parent topic. Also, WTF? I mean, come on, it's a fireball, do you really need an article to tell you what they're talking about? -- Ned Scott 06:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.