Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fios, Inc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 11:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fios, Inc
Not notable, possible conflict of interest by original editor (who unilaterally removed a prod tag earlier.) Sapphic 05:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Umm, no conflict of interest by me, seeing as how I do not work for this company nor have I ever been in contact. I'm a part of WikiProject Oregon and this company entry fits in that vein of work.--Christian B 15:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Also wanted to note that indeed I removed a tag A YEAR AGO after trying to get some sort of discussion on the article's talk page about how to improve the article. Since no one seemed interested or wanted to engage in a discussion, I removed it. This was almost one year ago from today...--Christian B 15:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies, I meant nothing personal. I had noticed that you took great interest in Oregon (and Portland – where Fios is headquartered) and in document discovery in general, and had a degree in a field that could very well apply. Thanks for the clarification! (I still don't think this company is notable, however – the report you cited isn't itself notable, and in any event isn't accessible anywhere I can find, at least not without paying the $3000 fee.) --Sapphic 15:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Totally understand where you were coming from; no apologies needed :)
- Apologies, I meant nothing personal. I had noticed that you took great interest in Oregon (and Portland – where Fios is headquartered) and in document discovery in general, and had a degree in a field that could very well apply. Thanks for the clarification! (I still don't think this company is notable, however – the report you cited isn't itself notable, and in any event isn't accessible anywhere I can find, at least not without paying the $3000 fee.) --Sapphic 15:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Also wanted to note that indeed I removed a tag A YEAR AGO after trying to get some sort of discussion on the article's talk page about how to improve the article. Since no one seemed interested or wanted to engage in a discussion, I removed it. This was almost one year ago from today...--Christian B 15:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Umm, no conflict of interest by me, seeing as how I do not work for this company nor have I ever been in contact. I'm a part of WikiProject Oregon and this company entry fits in that vein of work.--Christian B 15:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I'll agree that yes, the entry really needs to be expanded upon and have some cited references. That's something I'll try to do in the next several days. Perhaps I'll try to get it on the list for fix-ups for WikiProject Oregon - that surely would get the entry the kick in the pants it deserves.--Christian B 15:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Delete, doesn't appear to satisfy WP:CORP. Doctorfluffy 23:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete does not appear to have been worked on since nomination, no objection to Christian B copying to his sandbox for working on to see if he can get it up to par.--Alf melmac 23:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
