Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feral Scholar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 18:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Feral Scholar

Feral Scholar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:WEB and WP:V and should be deleted. This blog does not appear to notable, I have not been able to find non-trivial coverage of the blog in reliable sources, lots of chatter in the blogosphere but nothing verifiable. With an Alexa rank of 1,049,643, any remaining relevant information can be moved to Stan Goff. RWR8189 20:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Blogs must pass WP:WEB independently of their author(s), preferably only having their own articles when there is substantial importance of the blog demonstrated. --Dhartung | Talk 22:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of sources talking about this blog Corpx 23:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.